Legislature(2023 - 2024)
2024-03-12 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2024-03-12 Senate Journal Page 1876 SSCR 9 Senator Giessel moved the joint session consider SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 9 Disapproving Executive Order No. 132. SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 9 was read the second time and was before the joint session on final passage. The question being: "Shall SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 9 Disapproving Executive Order No. 132, pass the Joint Session?" The roll of the House was taken with the following result: 2024-03-12 Senate Journal Page 1877 HOUSE SSCR 9 Second Reading Final Passage YEAS: 26 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Allard, Armstrong, Carpenter, Carrick, Cronk, Dibert, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, Josephson, McCormick, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Ruffridge, Schrage, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Stutes Nays: Baker, Coulombe, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, McCabe, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Saddler, Sumner, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright The roll of the Senate was taken with the following result: SENATE SSCR 9 Second Reading Final Passage YEAS: 14 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bishop, Bjorkman, Claman, Dunbar, Giessel, Gray-Jackson, Kaufman, Kawasaki, Kiehl, Merrick, Olson, Stevens, Tobin, Wielechowski Nays: Hughes, Myers, Shower, Stedman, Wilson Excused: Hoffman TOTALS: YEAS: 40 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 and so, SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 9 passed and was referred to the Senate Secretary for engrossment and enrollment.